VCF renewals ▲ 31.4% YoY· Symantec EDR true ups ▲ 18%· Carbon Black avg quote uplift +22%· Mainframe MIPS capacity squeezes ▲· Audit notices ▲ 47% QoQ· Our last 10 deals avg −41% on quote· VCF renewals ▲ 31.4% YoY· Symantec EDR true ups ▲ 18%· Carbon Black avg quote uplift +22%· Mainframe MIPS capacity squeezes ▲· Audit notices ▲ 47% QoQ· Our last 10 deals avg −41% on quote
Wednesday · 27 May · MMXXVIIssue II
Independent · Buyer SideLive
Broadcom Negotiations
VMware · Symantec · CA · Carbon Black · Mainframe · Brocade The buyer's report on Broadcom contract economics. Not affiliated with Broadcom Inc.
VMware

What healthcare enterprises actually paid for VCF subscription renewals in North America.

Healthcare is the most active buyer cohort the Desk has tracked across VCF renewals in North America over the last 12 months. Verified against signed contracts, here is what the cohort actually paid per core, and what the variance band looks like inside the segment.

Healthcare enterprises in North America have been one of the most concentrated buyer cohorts for VCF subscription renewals across the last 12 months. Hospital networks, integrated delivery systems, payer health plans, and large physician group practices have all carried VCF renewals into the window between mid 2025 and mid 2026. The Desk has tracked 13 renewals across the segment, verified against the signed contracts the buyers shared with the Desk under engagement. The benchmarks below are the per core annual subscription rates that closed, the variance bands across the cohort, and the modal factors that explain why the rates spread the way they did. The numbers are sourced from signed contracts. They are not from public list prices, not from analyst surveys, not from desk briefings. The variance band is the buyer's working reference for what is achievable in a healthcare VCF renewal in this segment in 2026.

The headline number is the per core annual subscription rate. The cohort median was $312 per core per year on the closed VCF bundle. The interquartile range ran from $278 to $347. The lowest closed rate was $241 per core per year. The highest closed rate was $392 per core per year. The 151 dollar spread between lowest and highest across a same product cohort in the same vertical is the most informative number in the dataset. Two buyers in the same segment, on the same product, in the same year, can pay 60 percent more or less than each other depending on the structure of the deal.

The spread inside the cohort

Three factors explain most of the spread. The first is the deal size. Larger renewals closed at lower per core rates. Renewals above 5,000 cores closed at a median rate of $284. Renewals below 1,500 cores closed at a median rate of $349. The deal desk's volume discount mechanism is consistent across the segment. Larger commitments produce lower per unit rates. The second factor is the term length. Three year subscriptions closed at a median rate of $323. Five year subscriptions closed at a median rate of $289. The longer term produces a per core rate roughly 10 percent below the shorter term. The third factor is whether the renewal carried a credible exit modelling. Renewals where the buyer had modelled an alternative platform and presented the modelling closed at a median rate of $268. Renewals without a modelled alternative closed at a median rate of $341.

What the support tier adds

The per core rate above is the base subscription rate. It does not include support. Support is layered as a separate uplift. The cohort split as follows. Production tier added a median uplift of 14 percent over the base rate. Premier added a median uplift of 22 percent. Mission Critical added a median uplift of 34 percent. The selection of the tier was driven less by the buyer's actual production criticality and more by the buyer's historical tier in the prior contract. Eight of the 13 buyers in the cohort renewed at the same tier they had carried in the prior cycle without re evaluating whether the tier matched current operational needs.

"The per core rate is a useful anchor but the variance band is more useful. The same product, in the same segment, in the same year, varies by sixty percent across signed contracts. The negotiating structure produces the spread, not the product."Benchmarking Lead, The Desk

What add on lines added

VCF subscription renewals in the cohort frequently carried add on lines. Tanzu Standard or Application Platform appeared in nine of the 13 renewals. Aria Operations appeared in 11 of 13. NSX Advanced or Enterprise Plus appeared in seven of 13. The add on lines added a median 28 percent to the total annual contract value on top of the core VCF subscription. The variance was wide. Two buyers carried add on lines totalling more than 40 percent of contract value. Three buyers carried fewer than 10 percent. The add on density was driven primarily by historical contract scope rather than by current production utilisation. Buyers who reconciled the add on lines against actual production deployment before the renewal closed tended to carry lower add on densities.

Healthcare VCF subscription renewals tracked13
Median per core annual subscription rate$312
Interquartile range, per core annual rate$278 to $347
Lowest closed rate$241
Highest closed rate$392
Median support uplift, Premier tier22%
Median add on line density28% of ACV

What we have seen on live deals this quarter

A Fortune 200 hospital network closed a five year VCF renewal at $269 per core per year across a 4,200 core estate. The deal carried Production tier support, no Tanzu line, and a reconciled Aria Operations footprint at roughly 60 percent of the prior contract's count. The deal closed materially below the cohort median. The buyer's pre renewal reconciliation walked approximately 18 percent of the prior add on line scope.

An integrated delivery system in the Midwest closed a three year VCF renewal at $358 per core per year across an 1,800 core estate. The deal carried Mission Critical support inherited from a 2022 contract and full add on line scope from the prior cycle without reconciliation. The deal closed materially above the cohort median. The variance against the lower benchmark in the dataset was approximately 33 percent.

A regional payer modelled an alternative platform across a 3,100 core estate and presented the modelling in the renewal conversation without executing the migration. The deal closed at $258 per core per year on a four year term. The modelled alternative produced a closed rate at the lower edge of the cohort.

The takeaway

  • Healthcare VCF subscription renewals in North America closed at a median $312 per core per year across the Desk's 13 case cohort. The interquartile range ran from $278 to $347. The full spread ran from $241 to $392.
  • Three factors explain most of the spread. Deal size, term length, and whether the buyer modelled a credible alternative. Larger deals, longer terms, and modelled alternatives produced rates at the lower edge of the band.
  • The base subscription rate is the headline number. The support tier and add on line density add a median 50 percent on top. The variance in those two layers is wider than the variance in the base rate. The reconciliation discipline before renewal drives most of the difference.
Benchmarking a healthcare VCF renewal against signed contracts in the segment? Write to the Desk → Two analyst calls, no pitch.

Three related articles

Cross references. Service: Benchmarking. Practice: VCF Renewal. Calculator: VCF core calculator.
Correspondence Invited

Write before the quote becomes a position.

Two analyst calls. No pitch. We tell you what we would do, what the leverage actually is, and whether we are the right firm. If we are not, we will say so.
Who we work for. Buyer side only. No reseller relationship with Broadcom. No partnership of any kind. We do not earn anything from products sold or renewed. Only from outcomes delivered against the contract.